Pro-Life Action League

. . . because action speaks louder than words.

League history, NOW v. Scheidler, Action News, Joe Scheidler, League staff

Q & A on abortion, the unborn child, where we stand on the issues and more

Helping abortion-bound women choose life for their babies

Unmasking the truth about abortion in the public square

Our youth outreach, raising up a new generation of pro-life leaders

Abortion industry converts tell the inside story

News and commentary from the Pro-Life Action League

News and commentary from the Pro-Life Action League

Home Hotline Blog Article

Huge Supreme Court Victory for Religious Freedom in Hobby Lobby Case

Posted by John Jansen (June 30, 2014 at 10:12 am)

HobbyLobbyVictory240x320The U.S. Supreme Court issued a stunning decision today affirming the religious freedom rights of business owners, ruling in a 5-4 decision ruling that “closely held corporations” cannot be forced by the Obamacare HHS Mandate to provide contraception, sterilization, and abortion-causing drugs to their employees.

In its opinion [PDF], the Court stated that the federal government failed to demonstrate that forcing private corporations to provide these drugs and procedures to employees—even if their owners have strong conscientious objections to them—is the “least restrictive means” of providing free access to them.

The decision in these cases, Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood Specialties v. Sebelius, was the very last decision issued by the Court this term, and it was surely the most anticipated decision all year. That being said, it’s hard to underestimate the significance of this ruling affirming the First Amendment rights of business owners.

“This ruling in favor of Hobby Lobby is a victory for all who cherish religious freedom,” said Eric Scheidler, executive director of the Pro-Life Action League and one of the national directors of the Stand Up for Religious Freedom rallies. “The movement that began with hundreds of protest rallies outside federal court buildings has just won a great victory inside the nation’s highest court.”

But the struggle to safeguard religious freedom is far from over, Scheidler notes. “The court will soon be reviewing other challenges to the HHS Mandate and other provisions of Obamacare that trample religious liberty and freedom of conscience. Today’s victory is a tremendous encouragement as these battles continue.”

Celebrate This Victory for Religious Freedom!

A victory rally will be held in Chicago’s Federal Plaza [map] at 12 noon today to celebrate this court victory, and celebration rallies are being planned in many other cities across the country as well.

Why not hold a victory rally in your town to celebrate the Supreme Court’s ruling? If you do, you’ll want to do it by tomorrow evening at the latest.

The victory rally will have to be a fairly simple event, with so little time to plan. We suggest a half-hour rally with the the following format:

As for guest speakers, a clergyman would be a good choice, as would an elected official or candidate dedicated to the cause of religious freedom. But it you’re not able to find any special guests with such late notice, that’s okay.

If you do plan to hold celebration rally in the event of a Hobby Lobby victory, send out an email to all your contacts immediately so they’ll be prepared. Here’s a sample rally invitation email you can use.

You should also prepare a press release in advance about the victory rally. Here’s a press release template for you.

Can’t Hold a Rally? Then Celebrate Online!

Join in the Tweet Storm going on right now using the hashtag #religiousfreedom.

Here are some sample tweets you can use:

And click the image below to share on Facebook:

Hobby Lobby Victory graphic

[Back to Top]

Tags: , , , , Posted in Health Care, Law and Politics. Follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply to this Hotline Entry

We welcome a free and open exchange of ideas on the Pro-Life Hotline, from all points of view, but we request that you restrict your remarks to the topic(s) presented in the entry above.

To ensure constructive dialog, the following will not be tolerated:

You may use HTML code to style your comments.