Pro-Life Action League

. . . because action speaks louder than words.

League history, NOW v. Scheidler, Action News, Joe Scheidler, League staff

Q & A on abortion, the unborn child, where we stand on the issues and more

Helping abortion-bound women choose life for their babies

Unmasking the truth about abortion in the public square

Our youth outreach, raising up a new generation of pro-life leaders

Abortion industry converts tell the inside story

News and commentary from the Pro-Life Action League

News and commentary from the Pro-Life Action League

Home Hotline Blog Article

Planned Parenthood CEO Lies about Blocked Texas Ultrasound Bill

Posted by Eric Scheidler (September 8, 2011 at 10:30 am)

Women holding "Planned Parenthood Lies to You" signsAs part of my work fighting Planned Parenthood, I regularly monitor the abortion giant’s e-mail messages to supporters. I’m rarely surprised by the heated rhetoric and propaganda I see in these e-mails, but last Friday’s message from Planned Parenthood President Cecile Richards betrayed such contempt for the truth that even I was struck by it.

The message begins fairly typically, with an outlandish declaration:

Dear ________,

I’m appalled by what is happening in my home state. Governor Rick Perry and the Texas legislature have launched a relentless assault on Planned Parenthood and women’s health that is a true threat to women in Texas and beyond.

Note that Richards decries this “assault on Planned Parenthood and women’s health” as if the two are one and the same—and as if anyone would really be opposed to “women’s health,” least of all the 21 women members of the Texas legislature who voted in favor of the measure, well outnumbering the 15 women who voted against it.

Of course, by “women’s health” we know what Planned Parenthood really means: abortion. That’s the kind of rhetoric we’re used to. But Richards’ next paragraph rises to a crescendo of dishonesty:

This week, Gov. Perry and anti-women’s health legislators in Texas passed a bill that would force women seeking abortion care to view a sonogram. It would also require doctors to read an anti-choice script written by the anti-choice legislature . . .

The bill—HB 15—was actually passed way back in May, not last week, but that error seems almost quaint in comparison to the shocking mendacity of the way Richards characterizes the legislation.

Outright Lies about the Texas Ultrasound Bill

In reality, the bill required doctors to offer women the opportunity to see an ultrasound before undergoing an abortion.

And what Richards calls an “anti-choice script” is actually a mere description of the physical development of the fetus whose life the woman is considering aborting.

Of course, this kind of medically accurate information does tend rather to dissuade women from abortion than otherwise—but in so doing it is actually pro-choice, not “anti-choice.” It empowers women to make a more informed choice. So Richards is actually the one guilty of undermining freedom of choice here.

Note also how Richards tries to deflect the stigma of the word “abortion” by couching it alongside the word “care,” and uses the term “sonogram” rather than the far more familiar “ultrasound,” which brings to mind all those pictures people post on their fridges and Facebook profiles.

. . . To add to the cruelty, the only way to avoid these burdens would be for women to certify in writing that they are pregnant due to rape or incest.

Yes, the bill provides that women who became pregnant through rape and incest don’t have to hear the medical facts about their fetus’ development. But the Texas legislature was unwilling to make it easy for Planned Parenthood staffers to coach women into lying about how their children were conceived—just as they have been caught doing in cases of statutory rape.

But in any case, I fail to see why a woman who has already been victimized by a sexual predator should be deprived of accurate information about the innocent child she’s carrying. It’s a shame that this kind of concession seems to be necessary to get bills like these passed.

Richards’ Narrow View of “Health Care”

Richards goes on:

Stand with Planned Parenthood and Texas women: tell Gov. Perry to stop blocking women’s access to health care.

Again: for Richards, “access to health care” means nothing but “access to abortion”—but not access to accurate information about abortion, somehow.

Thankfully, a federal judge stopped enforcement of the worst parts of the new law just two days before they went into effect. His ruling pointed out that this law “compels physicians to advance an ideological agenda with which they may not agree, regardless of any medical necessity, and irrespective of whether the pregnant women wish to listen.”

The judge rightly saw an unconstitutional law designed to bring politicians into medical examination rooms and trample the rights of women and their doctors. Governor Perry immediately vowed to appeal the bill.

Any doctor who would insist that an accurate description of a living, growing human fetus—in other words, the medical facts—represents “an ideological agenda with which they may not agree” shouldn’t be compelled to “read a script” but to surrender his medical license!

And as for doctors’ conscience rights, Richards is more than willing to see them trampled when it comes to those who decline to be involved in abortion.

Tell him to stop. Tell Gov. Perry that Texans, and all Americans, need more access to affordable care, not less. Tell him that enough is enough.

Texas has more uninsured residents than any other state. But Governor Perry recently cut family planning funding by two-thirds—which could cut off health care to more than 300,000 Texas women. 300,000! . . .

Richards seems to forget that there’s a lot more to health care than what she calls “reproductive health care”—but which isn’t even that. For example, Planned Parenthood doesn’t provide mammograms. They diagnose but rarely treat sexually transmitted disease.

The bulk of their business is abortion and birth control. And nobody ever goes to Planned Parenthood for a broken leg, stomach flu, soar throat, migraine headache or any of the other common health problems facing those 300,000 women Richards is so worried about.

Repeating Lies Doesn’t Make Them True

For the remainder of her message, Richards does little more than repeat some of the outrageous claims we’ve already looked at, but for the sake of thoroughness I will include it all:

Women in Texas struggle to find affordable health care, but Governor Perry is trying to shut down the Planned Parenthood health centers that provide it. And now he is threatening to continue pushing legislation that would put doctors at risk of losing their medical licenses unless they read a script written by anti-choice lawmakers to every woman seeking abortion care.

Our leaders have a responsibility to protect our rights and expand access to desperately needed health care. It’s time for Gov. Perry to stop blocking women’s access to health care, and start advancing women’s rights and health.

Texas isn’t the only place that faces lawmakers working to undermine women’s health and rights—and Planned Parenthood is determined to fight back against their anti-women’s health, anti-choice policies in state after state. Thank you for everything you do to stand with Planned Parenthood and the women, men, and teens who rely on us.

Sincerely,

Cecile Richards, President
Planned Parenthood Federation of America

If Not “Choice,” What’s Richards’ Real Agenda?

For all the outrageous hypocrisy, distortion and outright falsehood in Richards message, it presents a tacit admission that should be encouraging to the pro-life movement: the more women know about abortion and the unborn child, the less likely they are to choose abortion.

If Richards were really a proponent of “choice,” she’d favor measures like this. But her real motives have nothing to do with “choice” or what she calls “women’s health.”

No, what’s really at stake for Richards when states pass these kinds of informed consent laws is the bottom line.

Planned Parenthood $$$When women decide against abortion, Planned Parenthood loses money. At least one third of their billion-dollar income comes from providing abortions. We know from whistleblowers like former Planned Parenthood staffer Abby Johnson that increasing abortion revenue is a priority.

So when it comes to informing women about the medical facts of abortion, Planned Parenthood has a conflict of interest.

In her e-mail message to her supporters, Richards uses one of her favorite phrases: “Enough is enough.” But for Cecile Richards and Planned Parenthood, there’s never enough abortion.

Meanwhile, here’s hoping Gov. Perry does as Richards warns and appeals the blockage of this bill. Fully implemented, it will give women more choice when it comes to abortion, and save lives.

[Back to Top]

Tags: , , , , Posted in Law and Politics, Planned Parenthood. Follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

10 Responses to “Planned Parenthood CEO Lies about Blocked Texas Ultrasound Bill”

Note: Visitor comments do not necessarily reflect the views of the Pro-Life Action League.

  1. Sarah says:

    I agree with pro life but i have no insurance so planned parenthood is the only place i can go to get my yearly examinations and so on Planned Parenthood isnt all that bad of a place and they surly arent the only place that performs abortions!!!

    September 9, 2011 at 12:57 am
  2. Nancy says:

    I am trying to understand the opposition to the “script”. Before someone can sign a consent form for surgery the MD is required to give all information about the surgery’s risks. How is this any different? They are telling the woman about the surgery, which does in fact stop a beating heart. Not telling someone does not make it any less true. Is the opposition afraid of bringing an in crisis woman, who wants her life situation (the pregnancy) to go away, into reality that she is indeed carrying a human life in her womb? Regardless of when one believes life starts, the embryo or fetus still becomes a living, breathing, thinking, feeling human being. Just because the woman does not want to bear the child, does not make the humanity growing inside of her any less.

    I, too, have used PP for annual exams when I was a poor student. But their “care” was to take the swab and hand out a prescription for BCPs if I wanted them. There was no “care”, as in discussion of diet, discussion of healthy life-style (which should include making safe sexual choices), no breast exam, no offer to check on my blood chemistry which can be effected by BCPs. As a national clinic, there was no continuity of care. The care was inpersonal, was not concerned with my health, only with getting me in and out as quickly as possible. I had questions to which I wanted answers, and they would not stop and discuss them with me.

    September 9, 2011 at 8:43 am
  3. Carol says:

    To Sarah: I’m sure there are other places you can get health care – true health care. I don’t know what state you are in or where you are but there are other options if you look for them. I live in CA for example and depending on your income there are a multitude of programs you can take advantage of here and see a doctor in a office or go to a clinic and see one there. Don’t buy into the idea that PP is the only place to get true care if you don’t have $$.

    September 9, 2011 at 11:13 am
  4. Planned Parenthood CEO Lies about Blocked Texas Ultrasound Bill | Dr. Alveda King's Blog says:

    [...] To read the remainder of the article please visit Pro-Life Action League. [...]

    September 9, 2011 at 11:39 am
  5. Bob says:

    Sarah, you said you agree with Pro-life, why? I think you really need to ask yourself the question, why? If you come to the conclusion that you agree with it because any other stance is murder of an innocent child then you are on the right track. And, if you come to that conclusion you can no longer say that PP is not that bad. I prayerfully try to see things through God’s eyes, maybe you could too!

    September 9, 2011 at 4:17 pm
  6. Planned Parenthood CEO Lies about Blocked Texas Ultrasound Bill | Foundation Life says:

    [...] Continue… 0 [...]

    September 11, 2011 at 3:38 pm
  7. Mary Potzer says:

    To those who do believe – no explanation is necessary. To those who do not believe – no explanation is possible!
    Cecile Richards heads one of the most misleading and deceitful organizations ever. Not only does the Planned Parenthood murder innocent babies, but their mothers too with botched abortions that they do not take responsibility for. Their only purpose is to destroy unwanted babies and make millions of dollars in doing so.
    I do not hate Cecile Richards, but detest what she does. And what she is doing is destroying also the innocence of children of all ages by educating them to sex in a wrongful way that will lead them to destruction. She is responsible for millions of abortions and I can only pray for her total conversion before she has to face her Maker and make an accounting of her life. Though our sins be as scarlet they can be forgiven by heartfelt repentence and the humility to seek God’s healing love. May she do so before it is too late!

    September 13, 2011 at 4:17 pm
  8. Tiffany says:

    To Sarah in your defense, a lot of women (including myself at one time) do not know that PP even provides abortions because they have never gone there for that purpose. The point of this is to inform people that regardless if you are going there for an abortion or not PP is not in the practice to provide “Women’s Health” they are in the business to make money as quickly as possible. It is true that most ligit practices also are a business for which profit is made but first and foremost their primary concern is for the health and well being of the patient. This is not the case for PP.

    September 14, 2011 at 1:38 pm
  9. “Choice on Earth”: Planned Parenthood Has Nothing New to Offer « Pro-Life Hotline says:

    [...] women’s health,” “attacking women’s rights” — same old, same old. We’ve heard it all a thousand times [...]

    December 7, 2011 at 4:56 pm
  10. Jene Rinke says:

    hi!,I like your writing so a lot! share we keep in touch more about your post on AOL? I need a specialist in this space to solve my problem. Maybe that’s you! Looking forward to look you.

    April 15, 2012 at 2:55 am

Leave a Reply to this Hotline Entry

We welcome a free and open exchange of ideas on the Pro-Life Hotline, from all points of view, but we request that you restrict your remarks to the topic(s) presented in the entry above.

To ensure constructive dialog, the following will not be tolerated:

You may use HTML code to style your comments.