Pro-Life Action League

. . . because action speaks louder than words.

League history, NOW v. Scheidler, Action News, Joe Scheidler, League staff

Q & A on abortion, the unborn child, where we stand on the issues and more

Helping abortion-bound women choose life for their babies

Unmasking the truth about abortion in the public square

Our youth outreach, raising up a new generation of pro-life leaders

Abortion industry converts tell the inside story

News and commentary from the Pro-Life Action League

News and commentary from the Pro-Life Action League

Home Hotline Blog Article

Pro-Life Link Parties

Posted by John Jansen (May 9, 2011 at 3:15 pm)

QuicktakeJosh Brahm of Life Report is launching a great new project today: “Pro-Life Link Parties.”

The idea is to allow pro-life bloggers to not only increase traffic to their blogs, but to allow pro-life blog readers opportunities to read numerous insights on a given topic from a variety of perpsectives within the pro-life movement, all grouped together in the same place.

The first link party is “On the Physical Dangers of Abortion,” to which I added a link to a post I wrote just last week about a new video from the Guttmacher Institute entitled, “Does the Abortion Industry Really Care about Women’s Safety?”

Check out other contributions on this topic here.

[Back to Top]

Posted in Abortion, Health Care, Our Opposition. Follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

One Response to “Pro-Life Link Parties”

Note: Visitor comments do not necessarily reflect the views of the Pro-Life Action League.

  1. Protecting “Choice” or Restricting Access to Information? « Pro-Life Hotline says:

    [...] of the links posted to the inaugural “Pro-Life Link Party” was the text of a speech by Abigail Seidman, who had to work as a “clinic escort” [...]

    Posted May 12, 2011 at 3:02 pm

Leave a Reply to this Hotline Entry

We welcome a free and open exchange of ideas on the Pro-Life Hotline, from all points of view, but we request that you restrict your remarks to the topic(s) presented in the entry above.

To ensure constructive dialog, the following will not be tolerated:

You may use HTML code to style your comments.