Pro-Life Action League

. . . because action speaks louder than words.

League history, NOW v. Scheidler, Action News, Joe Scheidler, League staff

Q & A on abortion, the unborn child, where we stand on the issues and more

Helping abortion-bound women choose life for their babies

Unmasking the truth about abortion in the public square

Our youth outreach, raising up a new generation of pro-life leaders

Abortion industry converts tell the inside story

News and commentary from the Pro-Life Action League

News and commentary from the Pro-Life Action League

Home Hotline Blog Article

Accomplishment #9: More and more Americans are calling themselves pro-life.

Posted by Eric Scheidler (January 13, 2013 at 4:00 pm)

NOTE: This article is one of a series on the “top ten” accomplishments of the pro-life movement over the past 40 years since unborn children were stripped of their legal right to life by the 1973 Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton Supreme Court rulings.

Pro-lifersIn 1995, the Gallup polling company asked Americans for the first time whether they consider themselves “pro-life” or “pro-choice” with respect to abortion. Only 33% answered “pro-life,” while 56% said they were “pro-choice.”

By 2002 the gap had tightened, and in 2009, Gallup reported a majority of 51% lining up under the pro-life banner, compared to 42% for pro-choice.

This trend has continued. In 2010 Gallup called the shift to the pro-life position “the new normal,” saying that their data suggests “a real change in public opinion.”

By 2012, the pro-choice number had dropped further, to 41%, a trend seen among Republicans, Democrats and independents.

What’s the reason for this “new normal”?

Gallup speculates that the “new normal” of more Americans saying they’re pro-life than pro-choice may be the result of the aggressively pro-choice policies of President Obama shifting people’s idea of what “pro-choice” means to the left.

But I think there’s much more to the story than that.

First, if Gallup’s right that people are linking the pro-choice label with a kind of pro-abortion extremism, that’s only thanks to our efforts in the pro-life movement. We’ve been showing what “choice” really means: dead babies and broken hearts.

At the same time, sidewalk counseling and the proliferation of pregnancy resource centers have shown the compassionate face of the pro-life movement.

The surge in the pro-life youth movement have played a part, too. Surveys now show young people are more pro-life than their parents.

But how pro-life are Americans?

So more Americans are saying they’re pro-life—but does that really matter? What does donning the pro-life label translate into “on the ground.”

Not much, according to some detractors. As one pro-choice blogger put it, “The anti-choice movement may be winning on labels, but they’re losing on the issues.”

“Who wouldn’t want to be ‘pro-life’?” they ask. Life’s a good thing, and nobody wants to say they’re “anti-life.” They also point to the fact that only a small minority of Americans support a total ban on abortion.

There’s something to this criticism. To a pro-life activist like me, being “pro-life” means opposing legal abortion in all cases. But only about 20% of Americans hold that view—and that’s been fairly consistent over the past 40 years.

Clearly, many of the people telling Gallup they’re pro-life don’t mean by that what we in the pro-life movement mean. But neither is it just a label.

Though only about a fifth of Americans think abortion should be banned outright, consistent majorities believe that abortion should be illegal at least some of the time.

Americans support legal restrictions on abortion like parental involvement, waiting periods, informed consent and bans on late term abortion.

But “pro-choice” champions like President Obama and Planned Parenthood CEO Cecile Richards can’t point to a single case in which they would say a woman should not have the right to choose abortion.

If that’s what it means to be “pro-choice,” no wonder people don’t want to say they’re in that camp.

Let’s work to make American’s more pro-life!

Still, there’s no denying the disconnect between people’s attitudes towards abortion and the way they cast their votes on Election Day—and probably in the way they respond when someone close to them is considering abortion.

Our challenge, then, is to build upon people’s desire to be called “pro-life,” and teach them what it really means to be pro-life: to build a society in which every unborn child’s life is valued and protected by law.

[Back to Top]

Tags: , , , Posted in Abortion, Face the Truth, Law and Politics, Pro-Life Activism, Sidewalk Counseling, The Culture War. Follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

3 Responses to “Accomplishment #9: More and more Americans are calling themselves pro-life.”

Note: Visitor comments do not necessarily reflect the views of the Pro-Life Action League.

  1. Accomplishment #4: We have helped women find healing after abortion | News of Life and Death says:

    [...] Groups like Silent No More Awareness give these women an opportunity to share their stories and discourage other women from making the same mistake. These testimonies have become a major factor driving public opinion against abortion. [...]

    January 27, 2013 at 2:10 am
  2. Generations for Life » Blog Archive » “Neither Do I Condemn You” says:

    [...] continue to receive post-abortion healing and speak out publicly about their experiences, there is less and less support for abortion among the general [...]

    March 19, 2013 at 8:39 am
  3. Serena says:

    Write more, thats all I have to say. Literally, iit seems as though you relied on the video to make your point.

    You obviously know whbat youre talking about, why waste your intelliggence on just posting videos to yur blog when you could be giving us something informative to read?

    August 1, 2014 at 10:04 pm

Leave a Reply to this Hotline Entry

We welcome a free and open exchange of ideas on the Pro-Life Hotline, from all points of view, but we request that you restrict your remarks to the topic(s) presented in the entry above.

To ensure constructive dialog, the following will not be tolerated:

You may use HTML code to style your comments.