Pro-Life Action League

. . . because action speaks louder than words.

League history, NOW v. Scheidler, Action News, Joe Scheidler, League staff

Q & A on abortion, the unborn child, where we stand on the issues and more

Helping abortion-bound women choose life for their babies

Unmasking the truth about abortion in the public square

Our youth outreach, raising up a new generation of pro-life leaders

Abortion industry converts tell the inside story

News and commentary from the Pro-Life Action League

News and commentary from the Pro-Life Action League

Home Hotline Blog Article

Planned Parenthood Drops Failing “Choice” Rhetoric

Posted by Matt Yonke (January 10, 2013 at 2:37 pm)

Cecile Richards No More ChoiceFeminist blog Jezebel reports that in an advanced press briefing yesterday, Planned Parenthood revealed a new strategy for how it will talk about abortion.

After polling Americans on how they feel about abortion and about the terms “pro-life,” “pro-choice,” and other language surrounding the abortion debate, the nation’s largest abortion chain is moving away from talking about abortion in the decades-old language of “choice” in favor of language that emphasizes the “difficulty” of the abortion decision.

Planned Parenthood has realized that the demographic they have to pursue and persuade is the majority of Americans who are somewhere in the middle on abortion.

Planned Parenthood Moves to Persuade the Squishy Middle

Most Americans believe it should be restricted in some senses — much more than Planned Parenthood would like — and so they’ve decided to shift from the decisive language of “choice” to the squishy language of moral ambiguity, which is where they would love the abortion debate to stay.

The change is important enough that Planned Parenthood CEO Cecile Richards was on hand for Wednesday’s briefing. From Jezebel:

“It’s an opportunity to talk to an enormous number of people we haven’t been talking to as much as we should,” said Planned Parenthood president Cecile Richards, who was also in attendance to help introduce the organization’s upcoming advertising campaign, which will highlight how complex and personal the decision to have an abortion can be with taglines such as “Only you know what it’s like to walk in your shoes” and “Decisions about reproductive health are personal. You can help keep them that way.”

Trading Old Activists for New

Planned Parenthood Executive Vice President Dawn Laguens was also on hand explaining that the word “choice” is no longer relevant. She said it spoke to women who had fewer choices at the dawn of the feminist struggle, but that younger women who have all the choices in the world open to them are not moved to fight by the idea of choice.

Clearly this move is a play toward their younger constituency and away from their long-standing, older activist base, who will doubtless be livid that Planned Parenthood is throwing their sacred word, their rallying cry, to the curb. But times change and Planned Parenthood is nothing if not a fair weather friend as last year’s Susan G. Komen funding debacle showed us clearly enough.

And that is the crux of the issue. “Choice” was only ever a piece of rhetoric for the pro-abortion movement, and now it’s become a failed piece of rhetoric, so they’re on to the next thing. They’ll talk about whatever they have to to keep people from considering the clear moral issues in the abortion debate.

Pro-Life Response? Double Down

So what should the pro-life movement’s response be? I move we double down.

Planned Parenthood wants things ambiguous? We will continue to be clear and we will not change the terms of the debate.

We will show the victims of abortion in the public square. We will stand in witness and mourning outside their killing centers and offer help and clarity to abortion-bound mothers. We will continue to expose their moral failings and push our governments to regulate the abortion industry more and more tightly. We will save every unborn baby we can from the abortionist’s clutches.

In short, we will continue to do what we as a movement have always done because we are motivated by principle, not profit; by truth, not ambiguity; and above all, by love for all human beings—no exceptions.

[Back to Top]

Posted in Our Opposition, Planned Parenthood. Follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

5 Responses to “Planned Parenthood Drops Failing “Choice” Rhetoric”

Note: Visitor comments do not necessarily reflect the views of the Pro-Life Action League.

  1. Jerry Vilt says:

    “In short, we will continue to do what we as a movement have always done because we are motivated by principle, not profit; by truth, not ambiguity; and above all, by love for all human beings—no exceptions.”!!!

    Amen. Alleluia!

    January 10, 2013 at 2:59 pm
  2. Rey Flores says:

    It is in the truth that life shall prevail.

    This has never been a battle about who can lie to people the best, but it sure has been PP’s modus operandi and they have now come to the realization that not only is their word of ‘choice’ irrelevant, but the organization itself is becoming less relevant as well.

    January 10, 2013 at 4:22 pm
  3. Christina Dunigan says:

    Of course the women are in difficult circumstances. That’s why they deserve better than to fall into the clutches of those who stand to benefit financially and politically from those circumstances.

    January 10, 2013 at 5:03 pm
  4. Planned Parenthood trying to co-opt “pro-life.” | Foundation Life says:

    [...] reported here yesterday, Planned Parenthood is now declaring that they’re through talking about “choice” — a term [...]

    January 11, 2013 at 10:17 am
  5. Weird NARAL video compares abortion to chewing gum | News of Life and Death says:

    [...] via an email from NARAL president Nancy Keenan, who is retiring soon. Apparently she didn’t get the memo from Planned Parenthood about abandoning the language of [...]

    January 30, 2013 at 2:26 am

Leave a Reply to this Hotline Entry

We welcome a free and open exchange of ideas on the Pro-Life Hotline, from all points of view, but we request that you restrict your remarks to the topic(s) presented in the entry above.

To ensure constructive dialog, the following will not be tolerated:

You may use HTML code to style your comments.