Pro-Life Action League

. . . because action speaks louder than words.

League history, NOW v. Scheidler, Action News, Joe Scheidler, League staff

Q & A on abortion, the unborn child, where we stand on the issues and more

Helping abortion-bound women choose life for their babies

Unmasking the truth about abortion in the public square

Our youth outreach, raising up a new generation of pro-life leaders

Abortion industry converts tell the inside story

News and commentary from the Pro-Life Action League

News and commentary from the Pro-Life Action League

Home Hotline Blog Article

Mobile Ultrasound Provider Files Lawsuit after Being Forced to Shut Down

Posted by John Jansen (March 8, 2013 at 2:29 pm)

If a pro-life pregnancy resource center operates a mobile ultrasound unit on privately owned land, you wouldn’t think there would be much that local authorities could do to stop it.

But you’d be wrong.

For nearly two years, TLC Pregnancy Services in Elgin, Illinois has provided teenage girls and women free pregnancy information, testing, and ultrasounds through its mobile ultrasound facility.

TLC has done so through the cooperation of an Evangelical Covenant Church as well as a pub, both of which have allowed their mobile ultrasound facility to park in their parking lots—again, it bears repeating, their private parking lots.  In less than two years, nearly 200 women visited the facility and received services.

But no women have been allowed to received services from the mobile ultrasound facility since last summer—because the city shut it down:

Last summer, Elgin moved to shut down TLC’s mobile facility for the rest of the year at both locations. Records indicate that, in August, Police Chief Jeffrey Swoboda, at the request of City Councilmember Anna Moeller, boarded the mobile facility while parked at JB’s and ordered TLC’s ultrasound technician, Jane DeFily, to “cease and desist” her activity.  The officer informed DeFily that a certain city councilperson had driven by and described the mobile facility as an “eyesore.”

Upon further investigation, TLC discovered that the city council had just amended its zoning code in June in a way that classified the mobile facility as a “temporary land use” limited to only four uses per year at each location.  When TLC attempted to renew its permit, it was told that no further permits would be issued in 2012.

Yesterday, TLC filed a federal lawsuit yesterday against the city of Elgin over its bogus new zoning codes that have effectively shut down their mobile ultrasound facility.

All Politics Is Local—So It Matters If Local Politicians Are Pro-Life

Many pro-lifers believe it’s critically important to vote pro-life when it comes to candidates running for “big” offices in national and state elections, but don’t necessarily believe a candidate’s stance on abortion matters much when it comes to “small” offices in local elections.

Let the outrageous — and indefensible — decision on the part of the Elgin City Council to shut down a mobile ultrasound facility be a lesson to us all: In local elections, it very definitely matters where a candidate stands on abortion.

If Elgin had had a city council full of members who were robustly pro-life, TLC would have continued, undisturbed, to serve women and girls in need to this day.

[Back to Top]

Tags: , , , , Posted in Health Care, Law and Politics, The Culture War. Follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

One Response to “Mobile Ultrasound Provider Files Lawsuit after Being Forced to Shut Down”

Note: Visitor comments do not necessarily reflect the views of the Pro-Life Action League.

  1. Miss Pat says:

    There is a pro-life pregnancy center in South Elgin so do you think they can let the moblie ultrasound unit park there?

    Posted March 8, 2013 at 11:12 pm

Leave a Reply to this Hotline Entry

We welcome a free and open exchange of ideas on the Pro-Life Hotline, from all points of view, but we request that you restrict your remarks to the topic(s) presented in the entry above.

To ensure constructive dialog, the following will not be tolerated:

You may use HTML code to style your comments.