Pro-Life Action League

. . . because action speaks louder than words.

League history, NOW v. Scheidler, Action News, Joe Scheidler, League staff

Q & A on abortion, the unborn child, where we stand on the issues and more

Helping abortion-bound women choose life for their babies

Unmasking the truth about abortion in the public square

Our youth outreach, raising up a new generation of pro-life leaders

Abortion industry converts tell the inside story

News and commentary from the Pro-Life Action League

News and commentary from the Pro-Life Action League

Home Hotline Blog Article

“Adjustment” to HHS Mandate Nothing But a Shell Game

Posted by Eric Scheidler (February 10, 2012 at 12:04 pm)

Shell GameEarlier this hour, President Obama announced in a White House Press Conference an “adjustment” to the HHS Mandate. The Mandate is set to go into effect in August, and will require all employer health plans to provide free contraceptives, sterilizations and abortifacients.

The HHS originally provided a “religious exemption” so narrow that it would exclude Catholic hospitals, universities and charities, forcing these institutions to act in direct opposition to Catholic teaching through the health care plans they provide. Institutions run by other religious organizations would be likewise affected.

In response to outcry from religious leaders—including 171 Catholic bishops—and Americans from across the political spectrum, Obama today outlined an “adjustment” to the HHS Mandate whereby the objectionable services will be paid for by insurers rather than directly by employers.

Setting aside the fact that contraceptives are not preventative health care—since pregnancy is not a disease—Obama’s adjustment is nothing but a shell game.

At the end of the day, religious employers are still required to provide health plans that offer free contraceptives, sterilizations and abortifacients.

And the cost of those “free” free services—ostensibly now to be borne by the insurer rather than the employer—has got to come from somewhere. From where? The premiums paid for those plans, of course.

Insurance companies aren’t stupid, and they’re not in business to give things away—not even not-for-profit insurers like Blue Cross Blue Shield, which still have to maintain the bottom line. They’ll quote employers a premium for their plans that takes into account the number of employees likely to demand these “free services.”

Obama’s “adjustment” is nothing but a cynical ploy to diminish the political fallout of the HHS Mandate. Fortunately, there’s no sign that religious and pro-life leaders are falling for it. Some are even calling it worse than the original mandate.

Nor should anyone be fooled by Obama’s disingenuous claim that what he did today was to “speed up” an accommodation process originally intended to unfold over the next year.

When the final Mandate was announced on January 20, a year “extension” was provided to religious institutions before they would be required to implement it. That’s all. The Mandate was final. As New York Archbishop Timothy Dolan put it, “The president is saying we have a year to figure out how to violate our consciences.”

But lest his effort to rewrite history be exposed, Obama—with HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius at his side—hurried off after making today’s announcement without taking any questions from the press.

It’s not surprising that Obama doesn’t want to face questions on this bogus “adjustment”—just as he doesn’t want to face the plain language of the U.S. Constitution with its guarantee of religious freedom. But Mr. Obama will have no choice but to face voters’ ire come election day.

[Back to Top]

Tags: , , , Posted in Contraception, Health Care, Law and Politics, Our Civil Rights, The Church, The Culture War. Follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

7 Responses to ““Adjustment” to HHS Mandate Nothing But a Shell Game”

Note: Visitor comments do not necessarily reflect the views of the Pro-Life Action League.

  1. jeanne breunig says:

    can we coordinate for that federal building protest you are spearheading in march?

    February 16, 2012 at 9:35 am
  2. Cardinal George Pulls No Punches on HHS Mandate « Stand Up for Religious Freedom says:

    […] In the current issue of the Archdiocese of Chicago’s newspaper, the Catholic New World, Francis Cardinal George has a must-read column in which he explains how high the stakes are in the fight against the HHS contraception mandate. […]

    February 29, 2012 at 2:18 pm
  3. ve sinh says:

    Your website is beautiful, which is popular among customers. I’ll come to visit again. Thank you very much!

    August 30, 2012 at 8:26 pm
  4. Cardinal Dolan Speaks Out on HHS Mandate Accommodation « Stand Up for Religious Freedom says:

    […] the fact the accommodation amounts to nothing more than the same shell game the administration has been playing since the Mandate was first announced, the bishops have […]

    February 7, 2013 at 4:06 pm
  5. Record Number of People Voice Objections to HHS Mandate « Stand Up for Religious Freedom says:

    […] the smoke had cleared following Kathleen Sebelius’ announcement of the HHS Mandate on January 20, 2012, opposition to this abject violation of religious freedom […]

    March 27, 2013 at 4:48 pm
  6. boom beach hack iphone cydia,boom beach ios hack download,boom beach hack tool ios,boom beach diamants illimités cydia,boom beach hack apk gratuit,boom beach triche apk,boom beach triche astuce,telecharger boom beach hack gratuit,boom beach diamond hac says:

    Votre Castle Battle Triche les joueurs permet via tricher parfois des
    gemmes illimités, de lor et man mana à votre technique.

    October 6, 2015 at 2:22 am
  7. Bills Jersey says:

    Outstanding post, I think blog owners should learn a lot from
    this weblog its very user genial. So much excellent information on here :D.

    October 27, 2016 at 2:21 pm

Leave a Reply to this Hotline Entry

We welcome a free and open exchange of ideas on the Pro-Life Hotline, from all points of view, but we request that you restrict your remarks to the topic(s) presented in the entry above.

To ensure constructive dialog, the following will not be tolerated:

You may use HTML code to style your comments.