Pro-Life Action League

. . . because action speaks louder than words.

League history, NOW v. Scheidler, Action News, Joe Scheidler, League staff

Q & A on abortion, the unborn child, where we stand on the issues and more

Helping abortion-bound women choose life for their babies

Unmasking the truth about abortion in the public square

Our youth outreach, raising up a new generation of pro-life leaders

Abortion industry converts tell the inside story

News and commentary from the Pro-Life Action League

News and commentary from the Pro-Life Action League

Home Hotline Blog Article

League Defends Free Speech at Chicago City Council

Posted by Matt Yonke (January 18, 2012 at 4:45 pm)

Yesterday, Pro-Life Action League Executive Director Eric Scheidler, Generations for Life’s John Jansen, myself and 150 other Chicagoans attended a meeting of the Chicago Committee on Special Events to defend free speech and public protest.

With the G8 and Nato summits coming concurrently to Chicago this spring, Mayor Rahm Emmanuel has taken the opportunity to ratchet up the city’s laws governing public protest.

The legislation, which was originally proposed as a temporary measure for the summits but has since become permanent, drastically increased fines and required a permit for any gathering of people in public space. The ordinance defines a “Public Assembly”, which requires a permit, as:

. . . a company of persons which is reasonably anticipated to obstruct the normal flow of traffic upon the public way and that is collected together in one place, or (ii) any organized march or procession of persons upon any public sidewalk that is reasonably anticipated to obstruct the normal flow of pedestrian traffic on the public way, but which does not meet the definition of parade set forth in this subsection.

Since there is no qualification on what constitutes a “obstructing the normal flow of pedestrian traffic”, police could define any action they don’t like taking place on a sidewalk as a “Public Assembly” and shut it down for lack of a permit.

The committee discussed a few aspects of the bill but none that concerned the gathered activist community. Rather they focused on changes dealing with parades, which were of little concern to us.

After the discussion they opened the floor to public comment but limited each person to two minutes each. Ironically, they cut off the microphone at the end of each person’s time limit, making a mockery of the free speech we were there to defend.

Dozens gave testimony about their concerns about the bill including myself and Eric. Some testified that things were working fine under the current laws, others said increased fines would make protest a luxury only the rich could afford, all agreed that the proposed ordinances had disastrous potential to be abused and that Chicago has a history of doing just that.

In the end, the measure passed out of committee with a vote of 7-3 and passed the full City Council this morning. The League will continue to fight this ordinance, especially if it is enforced in such a way as to dampen our, and our opposition’s, right to free speech.

[Back to Top]

Posted in Law and Politics, Pro-Life Activism. Follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

4 Responses to “League Defends Free Speech at Chicago City Council”

Note: Visitor comments do not necessarily reflect the views of the Pro-Life Action League.

  1. Chris says:

    This law was just unnecessary. The laws the city currently has on the books (and Chicagos reputation for enforcing laws) are more than sufficient.

    Posted January 18, 2012 at 8:19 pm
  2. Ricko says:

    Would you please give us a link to the actual law that the city council passed so that we can read the draconian detail?

    It seems that Illinois and Chicago are hell-bent on stripping us of our rights under the Northwest Ordinance and the subsequent Bill of Rights. The local politicians have attacked Freedom of Religion, Freedom of Speech and now Freedom of Assembly. Can a direct attack on Habeas Corpus be far behind?

    It has certainly become clear in the past year that our government has decided that the greatest threat to the state is a Catholic, Pro-Life citizen insisting on his or her right to practice their Faith!

    Posted January 19, 2012 at 8:19 am
  3. John Jansen says:

    Ricko—

    You can read the ordinance here [PDF].

    The section that greatly concerns us is 10-8-334, dealing with Public Assembly, starting on page 13.

    Posted January 19, 2012 at 9:38 am
  4. (Prolifer)ations 1-20-12 says:

    [...] Pro-Life Action League discusses new Chicago regulations that could make it harder for common citizens to assemble and practice their right to free speech. [...]

    Posted February 27, 2012 at 3:06 pm

Leave a Reply to this Hotline Entry

We welcome a free and open exchange of ideas on the Pro-Life Hotline, from all points of view, but we request that you restrict your remarks to the topic(s) presented in the entry above.

To ensure constructive dialog, the following will not be tolerated:

You may use HTML code to style your comments.