Comments on: Pro-Life Action League Reaches Agreement with Aurora in First Amendment Battle

By: Do some christmas jewelry shopping

Do some christmas jewelry shopping — Mon, 09 Apr 2012 14:56:40 +0000

Fantastic, I have been searching for something this good. I’ll subscribe for more later

By: C

Sat, 29 May 2010 05:21:02 +0000

It is your right to protest but you should be ashamed of yourselves for using those nasty dead baby pictures. I have to drive to Dominick’s or blockbuster several times a week. One day they might have that gross sign up and the next day it will not be there. It makes my son who is 6 cry and ask way more questions than a 6 year old should have to see and ask about. They tell me to drive way out of my way to go around it WHY??? WHY SHOULD I HAVE TO GO 5-10 MINUTES OUT OF MY WAY FOR THEM? It makes me want to go in front of their shopping centers and show their children pictures of 7′X4′ penis’ and see how you would like to explain inappropriate things to a 6 year old in your family! Feel free to protest all you want but you should think of other young children before you start showing those nasty pictures in public! Just put up signs no need to show a dead baby picture that even as an adult I don’t want to see!

By: Oneida Yedid

Oneida Yedid — Mon, 12 Apr 2010 22:31:15 +0000

Hello, This site is very interesting and enjoyable to read. I am a big fan of the subjects discussed. I also enjoy reading the comments, but notice that alot of people should stay on topic to try and add value to the original blog post. I would also encourage everyone to bookmark this page to your favourite service to help spread the word. Thanks

By: Jerry Vilt

Jerry Vilt — Wed, 07 Apr 2010 14:33:13 +0000

Urgently request this and my prior two replys (#8 and #9) be DELETED!

These replys are “nonsense” and more importantly DETRACT from Michael A. Judge’s (#7) most excellent reply! Jerry Vilt

By: Jerry Vilt

Jerry Vilt — Sat, 03 Apr 2010 15:00:56 +0000

In my opinion, the word “DANGEROUS” used in above statement means:

MOST EFFECTIVE!

NOT

DETRIMENTAL TO YOUR CAUSE!

By: Jerry Vilt

Jerry Vilt — Sat, 03 Apr 2010 14:54:07 +0000

continueing:

“DANGEROUS path to have gone down without coming from a high court decision”

To keep a purpose, goal, end, reason “in mind” when doing anything is, I believe, the best way to do anything…….but a “authority by man” (high court) is necessary but subservient to an even higher authority! Namely, the police will act with good faith (example….”warning sign will be posted to warn passerbys of grathfic pictures so that their children can be prepared”….something to that effect) This directive of promoting “good faith” can’t come from a “high court”!

By: Jerry Vilt

Jerry Vilt — Sat, 03 Apr 2010 14:31:08 +0000

“Allowing the City to control your signage is a DANGEROUS path to have gone down without coming from a high court decision.”

Tho I believe good faith is expressed above, the “content” of above statement is overwhelmingly complicated to me!

1. “control of signage”……we were forbidden to show signs, period……what is illogical, or dangerous, or anything but to fight this at the source……LOCALLY!

2. “high court decision”…….the Supreme Court was ready, willing and able to address our complaint???

By: Michael A. Judge

Michael A. Judge — Thu, 01 Apr 2010 01:55:33 +0000

Thanks to the Scheidler family for your decades of work, and having the courage to be one of the leaders in this worthwhile battle against evil. That said, I think this agreement may be dangerous for all pro-life demonstrators around the country in the future. Your whole motivation seems to be to make things easier, instead of standing on principle and constitutionality. (I respect your past sufferings and am not belittling the burdens imposed by litigation.) However, you have gained nothing that you did not ALREADY have a right to do, and the City only gave up what they did NOT have a right to do to you in the first place. This is why we will never get any respect, and hence, neither will the babies, because PRO-LIFERS don’t exhibit the fortitude and self-sacrifice required to make cities feel the effects of Recital “E.” Pro-life demonstrators need to stop acting like pacifists and start acting like REAL Christians, fighting peacefully and legally, by charging cities with gross negligence and other civil rights violations (s.1983) for not training their police officers after years of harassment and intimidation. In Attleboro, MA we have just been charged with 11 new cases, even after years spent winning previous court battles. Evil does not bow because you give the police coffee and donuts, or because you move to another location. Evil must be worn down (like during an exorcism), NOT PRO-LIFERS !!! Also, the so-called “pro-life lawyers” who are not standing up and fighting legally in order to protect their “reputation” and “bank account” will have the most for which to answer to GOD. I’d bet it was a lawyer who suggested this “Settlement” in the first place; and, would be surprised if anything changed in Aurora in the long term. Allowing the City to control your signage is a DANGEROUS path to have gone down without it coming from a high court decision. I’m almost positive the U.S. Supreme Court has NOT ruled on that yet. May God bless your family. You are loved across this country for your efforts. Your brother in Christ – Michael.

By: Pat Wisdom

Pat Wisdom — Tue, 30 Mar 2010 21:57:45 +0000

Praise GOD! I thank you Erik for all of your endeavors. It is too bad you had to spend your time in court for this liberty that is a given in this “free” USA. Thank you also for all of your work in saving the unborn. GOD really works with and through you and all of those who are on this team. GOD Bless you all!

By: Kathi

Kathi — Sat, 27 Mar 2010 05:55:51 +0000

Some good news at last! It sounds like democracy could be breaking out in Aurora.